[c-nsp] Sup32 TCAM limit

marco at linuxgoeroe.dhs.org marco at linuxgoeroe.dhs.org
Thu Jun 26 10:46:24 EDT 2008


>  From what I understand, the 'less specific prefix' punted routes would
> not be a problem, the problem was if less specific where in the TCAMs
> while more specifics not ? This would make for some interesting routing
> :-)

So it did :-)


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list