[c-nsp] eigrp and ospf on same switch

Dan Letkeman danletkeman at gmail.com
Sun Mar 2 10:54:13 EST 2008


Ben,

Thanks for the information.  I will try removing the default metric
commands to see if they are needed.

In what kind of scenario can redistributing both routing protocols
cause a routing loop?

Here is a crude diagram on how the system is setup:

Workstations---linux router w/ospf----cisco 3560 w/ospf &
eigrp----cisco 3560 w/eigrp---workstations

If I didn't redistribute both ways the devices on both sides could not
access each other.

Dan.

On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Ben Steele <ben at internode.com.au> wrote:
>
>  On 02/03/2008, at 4:55 AM, Dan Letkeman wrote:
>  >  Is there a simple explanation as to how
>  > the metric is calculated for eigrp?
>
>  5 things, Bandwidth, Delay, Reliability, Load and MTU.
>
>  I used to use the "Big Dogs Really Like Meat" acronym when I was first
>  learning about it to help remember :)
>
>  Most people should really only need to worry about the first two when
>  modifying for redistribution, that is bandwidth and delay, the
>  remaining 3 can generally just be set to 255 1 and 1500 respectively,
>  unless you see fit to change them for a specific reason.
>
>  As for your config, for starters try removing your default-metrics for
>  each routing protocol as it appears you've added them not really
>  knowing why you have, best to leave these as default for now, as for
>  redistributing this is where you do want to specify them so the
>  protocol knows how to treat these foreign routes and how to advertise
>  them to it's peers.
>
>  Also it's very unwise to redistribute protocol's both-ways, you are
>  asking for a routing loop, you should only need to do this one-way,
>  what is your reason for doing it both ways?
>
>  Have a read of http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp-toc.html
>  especially the redistributing section.
>
>  Cheers
>
>  Ben
>
>
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list