[c-nsp] eigrp and ospf on same switch
Dan Letkeman
danletkeman at gmail.com
Sun Mar 2 10:54:13 EST 2008
Ben,
Thanks for the information. I will try removing the default metric
commands to see if they are needed.
In what kind of scenario can redistributing both routing protocols
cause a routing loop?
Here is a crude diagram on how the system is setup:
Workstations---linux router w/ospf----cisco 3560 w/ospf &
eigrp----cisco 3560 w/eigrp---workstations
If I didn't redistribute both ways the devices on both sides could not
access each other.
Dan.
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 1:32 AM, Ben Steele <ben at internode.com.au> wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2008, at 4:55 AM, Dan Letkeman wrote:
> > Is there a simple explanation as to how
> > the metric is calculated for eigrp?
>
> 5 things, Bandwidth, Delay, Reliability, Load and MTU.
>
> I used to use the "Big Dogs Really Like Meat" acronym when I was first
> learning about it to help remember :)
>
> Most people should really only need to worry about the first two when
> modifying for redistribution, that is bandwidth and delay, the
> remaining 3 can generally just be set to 255 1 and 1500 respectively,
> unless you see fit to change them for a specific reason.
>
> As for your config, for starters try removing your default-metrics for
> each routing protocol as it appears you've added them not really
> knowing why you have, best to leave these as default for now, as for
> redistributing this is where you do want to specify them so the
> protocol knows how to treat these foreign routes and how to advertise
> them to it's peers.
>
> Also it's very unwise to redistribute protocol's both-ways, you are
> asking for a routing loop, you should only need to do this one-way,
> what is your reason for doing it both ways?
>
> Have a read of http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/103/eigrp-toc.html
> especially the redistributing section.
>
> Cheers
>
> Ben
>
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list