[c-nsp] T1 Bonding with PA-MC-T3

[Jon Lewis]

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, david raistrick wrote:

> On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Nick Voth wrote:
>
>> Thanks very much David. That definitely helps. Yes, our 2 T's are on the
>> same path to the destination so it looks like per-packet would be best in
>> that case. However, with "per-packet" can you utilize the full speed of the
>> 2 T's as if they were bonded like in MLPPP? That's the ultimate goal here.
>
> Memory says "yes" you get the full speed of 3Mb available with per-packet.
> It has been 8 years since I last used it, but I'm sure someone can back
> up my memory. ;)

per-packet will give you a 3mb pipe...but the advantage to MLPPP is it 
does the same and guarantees preservation of packet ordering.  Per-packet 
can/will result in out of order packets which can really foul up VOIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jon Lewis                   |  I route
  Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
  Atlantic Net                |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________