[c-nsp] T1 Bonding with PA-MC-T3

[David Coulson]

Nick Voth wrote:
> Thanks again guys. It seems that the consensus from all that I've read and
> the replies that I've gotten is that using CEF with "per-packet" is a great,
> low overhead way to do it, BUT with sensitive applications like VoIP, MLPPP
> will keep your packets in order better. I'll experiment and see. Thanks
> again for everyone's advice!
>   
Actually, last time I tried to run MLPPP for VoIP I had more problems 
than if I just used CEF per-packet. I had fragmentation disabled, so I 
really have no idea what I was doing wrong.