[c-nsp] 3550-48 -> 3560-48TS-E migration?

[Ian MacKinnon]

Jon Lewis wrote:
> Having just gone past the end of software maintenance date for the 3550,
> and with the need to start at least looking at supporting IPv6 on our
> customer aggregation switches in the not so distant future, I suppose it's
> time to seriously consider the 3560-48TS as a replacement / upgrade path
> for our 3550-48's.
B****r, you are right, 7May was end of software updated, 2011 for end of 
support (more money required for no imediate gain)

One big issue I have with 3560 is outbound policing.
I can't see how to limit traffic either on a SVI or to something less 
than 10% of actual port speed.



>
> With the 3550-48's, we've been getting away with configuring generally all
> or nearly all the FE interfaces as routed ports using the default SDM
> template, and not run into any problems, even though this template is
> allegedly optimized for 8 routed interfaces.  Can the 3560-48TS be used
> similarly without getting into software forwarding?
>
> I'd love to hear from someone using the 3560-48TS in a mixed v4/v6
> environment with 48 routed ports, since cisco's docs that I've found so
> far don't seem to suggest how likely this is to work.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Jon Lewis                   |  I route
>    Senior Network Engineer     |  therefore you are
>    Atlantic Net                |
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

--

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. Any
offers or quotation of service are subject to formal specification.
Errors and omissions excepted.  Please note that any views or opinions
presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily represent those of Lumison and nPlusOne.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses.  Lumison and nPlusOne accept no liability for any
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.