[c-nsp] SXF15/SXF15a experiences?

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 08:34:17PM -0800, Janet Sullivan wrote:
> Of course, opinions on SXH3a are also welcome, but I'm a bit untrusting 
> of the SXH beast still. <grin>

We're actually quite happy with SXH3a.  SXH3 is evil (BGP ghost).

I haven't tested anything on SXF more recent than SXF13a, and that is 
working quite well for us as well.  There have been reports about crashes
and BGP funkiness in SXF15, so I'd be a bit wary.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20081105/d1e16582/attachment.bin>