[c-nsp] SXF15/SXF15a experiences?
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Wed Nov 5 06:00:53 EST 2008
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 06:52:28AM -0800, Janet Sullivan wrote:
> In my SXF15 experience, I actually shut down a BGP peer (good 'ol nei
> xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx shut), and while BGP saw the routes go away, the local
> routing table on the box did not. That seems slightly different than
> the ghost bug as I understood it, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.
That's definitely different from the Ghost Bugs.
In the ghost bugs, at least as far as I observed, updates BGP table ->
routing table happened just fine. Only BGP withdraw messages to other
(i-)BGP peers were sometimes lost, so a route "stuck" in the other
router's BGP table.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20081105/d830c912/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list