[c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation

[Brian Turnbow]

We're stil on  12.2.31SB13 with g2s  mainly due to an issue we found with tcp header compression with SRC
We have some small vbr connections for voip with header compression enabled and found that a telnet session over the link would cause the router to crash in SRC.

Brian




-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: venerdì 7 novembre 2008 14.23
To: 'Rinse Kloek'; 'Roddy Strachan'
Cc: 'Cisco-nsp'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation

We're running 12.2(33)SRC2 on NPE-2G's with no real issues - we were very
brave and ran some 12.4T code for a while and had a major issue every 3-4
weeks that required a reboot (inbound sessions would just stop coming in
pretty much via l2tp tunnels).

On the NPE-1G's we're running same release with no issue neither....

Paul


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rinse Kloek
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:14 PM
To: Roddy Strachan
Cc: Cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation

What kind of features do you use with the 7206VXR box ? We are also 
looking to upgrade to 12.2.31SB13 because we have some problems with 
12.2(31)SB6.

regards Rinse

Roddy Strachan schreef:
> Ruben,
>
> Funny you mention it.
>
> I've just finished an upgrade of a mixture of 7301 and 7206vxr to
> 12.2(31)SB13.
>
> Had a 7301 running in production for 1 week, no issues, the LNS seems a
lot
> more stable if you ask me.
>
> Don't know how the 7206 will go as they have been in production less than
an
> hour :).
>
> So far so good, no real issues to report.
>
>
>
> On 7/11/08 8:03 AM, "Ruben Alvarez" <raa at opusnet.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm upgrading IOS on my c7206VXR with an npe-300 and:
>> UBR7200-I/O-2FE/E
>> PA-A3-T3=
>> PA-IMA-T1=
>> PA-4E=
>> I'm currently using 122-28.SB2 and noticed a 122-31.SB.  Is anyone using
the
>> 12.2(31)SB instead of the 12.2(28)SB?  I've been looking online and
haven't
>> seen much about it.  I assume it's got the same features as (28)?  If
anyone
>> has any feedback let me know.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>     
>
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
>  solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. 
> Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this 
> email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please note that
>  any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
>  author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation. 
> Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for 
> the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability for any 
> damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>   

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/