[c-nsp] help: copy run tftp
ambedkar
p_ambedkar at rediffmail.com
Sun Nov 9 23:24:22 EST 2008
Hi,
First create a file in the linux.
cd /tftp/
touch xyz(filename)
chmod 777 xyz
--------------
in the router:
copy run tftp://ipaddress/xyz
try it.
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net wrote :
>Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
> cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: IP Cef load sharing, quick question (Peter Rathlev)
> 2. Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy (Daniel Lacey)
> 3. Re: Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy (Rinse Kloek)
> 4. Re: Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation (Rinse Kloek)
> 5. Re: Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy (Pete S.)
> 6. Re: Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy (Asad)
> 7. Re: Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation (Paul Stewart)
> 8. Re: help: copy run tftp (Aaron)
> 9. Re: help: copy run tftp (Childs, Aaron)
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:32:31 +0100
> From: Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk>
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IP Cef load sharing, quick question
>To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com>
>Cc: "'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>Message-ID: <1226079151.3474.8.camel at abehat>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 08:28 -0500, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > We have a Simple L3 switch (I think it's a 2960G) that we need to
do
> > some even simpler fault tolerance and load sharing on.
>
>They're not 2960s, since those are L2 only. Maybe 3560s?
>
> > We were going to connect this switch to 3x switches upstream and
then
> > do something like this:
> >
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/32 gwip
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/33 gwip
> > ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 g0/34 gwip
>
>As Steinar mentions, you should use a specific next hop address. I
>assume that the three interfaces are routed ports, or that they use
>seperate VLANs. What's upstream?
>
> > When we were testing we noticed some (well, quite a bit) of
strangeness
> > with traceroutes and the like (many multiple hops for the same,
hop..
> > etc)
>
>What exactly do you mean with "many multiple hops"? Different answers
>for multiple requests with the same TTL (same hop in traceroute) is
not
>all that unnormal for multiple paths -- each path is elegible for the
>traffic, so each next hop router can answer.
>
>The L3 switches (i.e. not software based routers) typically use a
hashed
>load sharing algorithm, resulting in per destination or per source
(or a
>combination) load sharing. They could also include the ports in the
>hashing, meaning that a traceroute using a different source port per
>probe would result in different next hops. If this is unwanted, you
can
>change the algorithm to something that doesn't include L4 ports.
>
> > is there a better way to do what we're trying to achieve?
> >
> > We were thinking about maybe doing VRRP on the 3 switches upstream
but
> > then we would only be using 1Gbps and the goal is to be able to
use "a
> > little more than" 1Gbps.
>
>You _could_ use GLBP as a load sharing enabled equivalent of VRRP.
Don't
>know is your hardware/software supports it though. And equal cost
>multipath (ECMP) would be my preferred choice if possible.
>
>Regards,
>Peter
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:30:23 -0800
> From: Daniel Lacey <daniel_p_lacey at yahoo.com>
>Subject: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Message-ID: <4914893F.7050806 at yahoo.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters.
>I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch.
>
>I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the
other
>goes down.
>This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues.
>
>I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a
>Multilink bundle?
>
>Any other suggestions?
>
>Thanks,
>Dan Lacey
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:47:35 +0100
> From: Rinse Kloek <rinse.kloek at isp.solcon.nl>
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy
>To: Daniel Lacey <daniel_p_lacey at yahoo.com>
>Cc: Cisco-nsp <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>Message-ID: <49148D47.3000808 at isp.solcon.nl>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>One option is to configure bot interfaces with the same IP adresses
and
>settings and use the following command on the primary interface:
>
>interface GigabitEthernet0/1
> backup interface GigabitEthernet0/2
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
>
>interface GigabitEthernet0/2
> ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
>
>The GigabitEthernet 0/1 will be up and the GigabitEthernet 0/2 will
be
>standby. If the link on Gi0/1 is going down, Gi0/2 will get up.
>
>regards Rinse
>
>Daniel Lacey schreef:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters.
> > I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch.
> >
> > I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the
> > other goes down.
> > This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues.
> >
> > I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a
> > Multilink bundle?
> >
> > Any other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan Lacey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 19:51:58 +0100
> From: Rinse Kloek <rinse.kloek at isp.solcon.nl>
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation
>To: Paul Stewart <paul at paulstewart.org>
>Cc: 'Cisco-nsp' <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>Message-ID: <49148E4E.1070001 at isp.solcon.nl>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Do you use 12.2(33)SRC2 in a box as Aggregation Router ?
>One bug we discovered was a Netflow bug wich resulted in crashes
>(CSCsu87248)
>
>kind regards Rinse
>Paul Stewart schreef:
> > We're running 12.2(33)SRC2 on NPE-2G's with no real issues - we
were very
> > brave and ran some 12.4T code for a while and had a major issue
every 3-4
> > weeks that required a reboot (inbound sessions would just stop
coming in
> > pretty much via l2tp tunnels).
> >
> > On the NPE-1G's we're running same release with no issue
neither....
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> > [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Rinse
Kloek
> > Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 4:14 PM
> > To: Roddy Strachan
> > Cc: Cisco-nsp
> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation
> >
> > What kind of features do you use with the 7206VXR box ? We are
also
> > looking to upgrade to 12.2.31SB13 because we have some problems
with
> > 12.2(31)SB6.
> >
> > regards Rinse
> >
> > Roddy Strachan schreef:
> >
> >> Ruben,
> >>
> >> Funny you mention it.
> >>
> >> I've just finished an upgrade of a mixture of 7301 and 7206vxr to
> >> 12.2(31)SB13.
> >>
> >> Had a 7301 running in production for 1 week, no issues, the LNS
seems a
> >>
> > lot
> >
> >> more stable if you ask me.
> >>
> >> Don't know how the 7206 will go as they have been in production
less than
> >>
> > an
> >
> >> hour :).
> >>
> >> So far so good, no real issues to report.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/11/08 8:03 AM, "Ruben Alvarez" <raa at opusnet.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> I'm upgrading IOS on my c7206VXR with an npe-300 and:
> >>> UBR7200-I/O-2FE/E
> >>> PA-A3-T3=
> >>> PA-IMA-T1=
> >>> PA-4E=
> >>> I'm currently using 122-28.SB2 and noticed a 122-31.SB. Is
anyone using
> >>>
> > the
> >
> >>> 12.2(31)SB instead of the 12.2(28)SB? I've been looking online
and
> >>>
> > haven't
> >
> >>> seen much about it. I assume it's got the same features as
(28)? If
> >>>
> > anyone
> >
> >>> has any feedback let me know.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended
> >> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> >>
> > addressed.
> >
> >> Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have
received this
> >> email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please
note that
> >> any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those
of the
> >> author and do not necessarily represent those of the
organisation.
> >> Finally, the recipient should check this email and any
attachments for
> >> the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability
for any
> >> damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:56:21 -0500
> From: "Pete S." <pshuleski at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy
>To: "Daniel Lacey" <daniel_p_lacey at yahoo.com>
>Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Message-ID:
> <50f158990811071056i485be057sb4809519cfbce6c5 at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>You can make each port a routed interface(/30 or /31) to the 6500.
Control
>the failover/load balancing with your IGP.
>
>--Pete
>
>On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Daniel Lacey
<daniel_p_lacey at yahoo.com>wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters.
> > I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch.
> >
> > I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the
other
> > goes down.
> > This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues.
> >
> > I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a
Multilink
> > bundle?
> >
> > Any other suggestions?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dan Lacey
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 19:00:49 +0000
> From: "Asad" <asadh at comcast.net>
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy
>To: "Daniel Lacey" <daniel_p_lacey at yahoo.com>,
> cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net, cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Message-ID:
> <623938200-1226084442-
cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1922886597-
@bxe125.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>You can try a port-channel and add both interfaces to bundle. This
would provide redundancy + more BW.
>
>Asad
>Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
>-----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Lacey <daniel_p_lacey at yahoo.com>
>
>Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:30:23
>To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>Subject: [c-nsp] Multiple Ethernet links for redundancy
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>I have a 7206 with two fastethernet port adapters.
>I would like to have both of these run to the 6506 switch.
>
>I need a scenario that would allow one of the links to work if the
other
>goes down.
>This is for redundancy and not for bandwidth issues.
>
>I was wondering if it is possible (or desirable) to make them a
>Multilink bundle?
>
>Any other suggestions?
>
>Thanks,
>Dan Lacey
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 14:09:18 -0500
> From: "Paul Stewart" <paul at paulstewart.org>
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation
>To: "'Rinse Kloek'" <rinse.kloek at isp.solcon.nl>
>Cc: 'Cisco-nsp' <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>Message-ID: <000001c9410c$569d9270$03d8b750$@org>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Yes, that's correct - LAC/LNS
>
>We don't run Netflow off that box in particular (we do in our core
7600's
>though) so haven't come across that bug yet ;)
>
>Paul
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
> From: Rinse Kloek [mailto:rinse.kloek at isp.solcon.nl]
>Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 1:52 PM
>To: Paul Stewart
>Cc: 'Roddy Strachan'; 'Cisco-nsp'
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cisco IOS for broadband aggregation
>
>Do you use 12.2(33)SRC2 in a box as Aggregation Router ?
>One bug we discovered was a Netflow bug wich resulted in crashes
>(CSCsu87248)
>
>kind regards Rinse
>Paul Stewart schreef:
> > We're running 12.2(33)SRC2 on NPE-2G's with no real issues - we
were very
> > brave and ran some 12.4T code for a while and had a major issue
every 3-4
> > weeks that required a reboot (inbound sessions would just stop
coming in
> > pretty much via l2tp tunnels).
> >
> > On the NPE-1G's we're running same release with no issue
neither....
> >
> > Paul
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:57:05 -0500
> From: Aaron <dudepron at gmail.com>
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] help: copy run tftp
>To: Garry <gkg at gmx.de>
>Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Message-ID:
> <480dad640811071257k761564e0n26f9066903048f7c at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>Create the file in your tftp dir using touch...
>touch <filename>
>then
>chmod 777 <filename>
>Then you will should be good to go
>
>Note that this file is world readable and writable..
>
>Aaron
>
>On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Garry <gkg at gmx.de> wrote:
>
> > adrian kok wrote:
> > > router#copy running-config tftp
> > > Address or name of remote host []? 192.168.0.3
> > > Destination filename [router-confg]?
> > > TFTP: error code 1 received - File not found
> > >
> > Did you allow the TFTP-Clients to create new files? If not, you
will
> > have to create the file first with sufficient rights for the TFTP-
Server
> > to overwrite, than copy again.
> >
> >
> > -garry
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 9
>Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 16:54:59 -0500
> From: "Childs, Aaron" <aaron at wsc.ma.edu>
>Subject: Re: [c-nsp] help: copy run tftp
>To: adrian kok <adriankok2000 at yahoo.com.hk>,
> "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>Message-ID:
> <3760B7E1B344364AA0384B231FE7BA6915787FC7 at ex-
be1.ads.wsc.ma.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Hi Adrian,
> Add -c to the server_args. This will allow the tftp clients
create the file.
>
>Aaron
>-----------
>Aaron Childs
>Assistant Director, Networking
>Westfield State College
>http://www.wsc.ma.edu/it/
>________________________________________
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [cisco-nsp-
bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of adrian kok
[adriankok2000 at yahoo.com.hk]
>Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 7:52 AM
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: [c-nsp] help: copy run tftp
>
>Hi
>
>I install tftp server in linux and it is running
>
>router#copy running-config tftp
>Address or name of remote host []? 192.168.0.3
>Destination filename [router-confg]?
>.....
>%Error opening tftp://192.168.0.3/router-confg (Timed
>out)
>
>After checking tftp server in 192.168.0.3, I fix it to
>allow the router connect.
>
>but when I run command in second time, it is another
>error
>
>it shows the file not found! why?
>
>router#copy running-config tftp
>Address or name of remote host []? 192.168.0.3
>Destination filename [router-confg]?
>TFTP: error code 1 received - File not found
>
>Thank you
>
>Send instant messages to your online friends
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list
>cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>
>End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 72, Issue 31
>*****************************************
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list