[c-nsp] Policy Based Routing on PE

[Rodney Dunn]

hmmm.....interesting question. VRF aware PBR wouldn't help.

You had better try it in the lab....but I wonder along Mat's suggestion
if you could build a gre tunnel over interface 1 and apply a PBR
policy on the tunnel. Thinking that after the mpls disposition the
ingress features (pbr) on the tunnel might kick in.

Tunnels are different from a feature processing perspective and
mpls2ip makes it even more complex.

Can he try that just to see if it works?

Rodney

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 01:34:54PM +0000, Mateusz B?aszczyk wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Brandon,
> 
> 2008/11/12 Brandon Price
> 
> >
> > I have a PE with 2 interfaces going to the same CE in vrf CUSTA.
> > I would like packets with a certain SOURCE ip to take interface 2 and
> > all other packets to follow normal routing in the vrf (interface 1).
> 
> How about GRE tunnel between SOURCE and CE in question, with PBR on
> SOURCE side if needed to direct traffic towards the tunnel?
> 
> > Where on the PE would I set up the route-map ? Any configuration
> > examples?
> 
> Unless there is some special feature I don't know about, it seems
> there is no way.
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> - -mat
> 
> - --
> pgp-key 0x1C655CAB
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFJHCz9+BuaDRxlXKsRAt83AJ9YakWigzpon/8VDJ4s3AL0XvPfHwCeLWWV
> 3W4XMbcKq05a0vlCfpc+hdE=
> =fLim
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/