[c-nsp] Cisco 7600 vlan issue

[Tassos Chatzithomaoglou]

Just to add (if i remember right) that ES and SRB didn't support local VLAN significance under single tagged subifs.
I haven't checked if SRD and/or ES+ solve this problem.

--
Tassos

Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote on 28/11/2008 18:01:
> You're looking for "local VLAN significance".
> 
> You probably have to get one of the WAN-style (ES20/40 for sure, don't 
> know for SIP/SPA) cards.
> 
> -- 
> Tassos
> 
> Mark Tech wrote on 28/11/2008 17:52:
>> Hi
>> With my GSR, I can split traffic on seperate physical interfaces, 
>> reusing the same vlan #, i.e.
>>
>> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/6.2
>>  encapsulation dot1Q 2
>>  ip address 7.7.7.1 255.255.255.252
>>  no ip directed-broadcast
>>  no cdp enable
>> !
>> interface GigabitEthernet0/0/7.2
>>  encapsulation dot1Q 2
>>  ip address 8.8.8.1 255.255.255.252
>>  no ip directed-broadcast
>>  no cdp enable
>>
>> However with a 7600, if I try to do the same I get the following error:
>>
>>
>>
>> interface GigabitEthernet1/9.2
>>  encapsulation dot1Q 2
>>  ip address 3.3.3.1 255.255.255.252
>>  no cdp enable
>> !
>> 7600(config)#interface GigabitEthernet1/10.2
>> 7600(config-subif)# encapsulation dot1Q 2
>> Command rejected: VLAN 10 not available
>> 7600(config-subif)#
>>
>>
>> Is there anyway around this? I want the 7600 to act like a router, not 
>> a switch!
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>      
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>