[c-nsp] Fwd: NAT in VRF

[Luan Nguyen]

Yes you can.  I used to do that with 2 VRF-Lites on 2 DMVPN tunnels.
Platform doesn't make any different.


Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
www.NetCraftsmen.net


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gary Roberton
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 7:28 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] Fwd: NAT in VRF

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gary Roberton <gary.ciscomail at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Subject: NAT in VRF
To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>


Can someone please confirm for me that you can have the same IP address in
different VRFs natted to different destinations.  In other words;

217.1.1.1 nat to 10.1.1.1 in VRF A
217.1.1.1 nat to 192.168.1.1 in VRF B

I can't see any reason why not.

What about if using VRF-Lite on a 3845, does that make any difference?

Its a funny question but I have been asked this and have no access to the
kit to prove it working and I have to have a solid answer.

Thanks.

Gary
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/