[c-nsp] Fwd: NAT in VRF

[Gary Roberton]

Thanks Luan

Can anyone else confirm this also?

Thanks

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Luan Nguyen <luan at netcraftsmen.net> wrote:

> Yes you can.  I used to do that with 2 VRF-Lites on 2 DMVPN tunnels.
> Platform doesn't make any different.
>
>
> Luan Nguyen
> Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
> www.NetCraftsmen.net
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gary Roberton
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 7:28 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Fwd: NAT in VRF
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Gary Roberton <gary.ciscomail at gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:13 AM
> Subject: NAT in VRF
> To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>
>
> Can someone please confirm for me that you can have the same IP address in
> different VRFs natted to different destinations.  In other words;
>
> 217.1.1.1 nat to 10.1.1.1 in VRF A
> 217.1.1.1 nat to 192.168.1.1 in VRF B
>
> I can't see any reason why not.
>
> What about if using VRF-Lite on a 3845, does that make any difference?
>
> Its a funny question but I have been asked this and have no access to the
> kit to prove it working and I have to have a solid answer.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gary
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>