[c-nsp] Fwd: NAT in VRF

[Derick Winkworth]

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_3t/12_3t14/feature/guide/gtnatvi.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_2t/12_2t13/feature/guide/ftnatvpn.html

Here are two different ways to do what you are asking for, I hope!



Gary Roberton wrote:
> Thanks Luan
>
> Can anyone else confirm this also?
>
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Luan Nguyen <luan at netcraftsmen.net> wrote:
>
>   
>> Yes you can.  I used to do that with 2 VRF-Lites on 2 DMVPN tunnels.
>> Platform doesn't make any different.
>>
>>
>> Luan Nguyen
>> Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
>> www.NetCraftsmen.net
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gary Roberton
>> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 7:28 AM
>> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> Subject: [c-nsp] Fwd: NAT in VRF
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Gary Roberton <gary.ciscomail at gmail.com>
>> Date: Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 10:13 AM
>> Subject: NAT in VRF
>> To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
>>
>>
>> Can someone please confirm for me that you can have the same IP address in
>> different VRFs natted to different destinations.  In other words;
>>
>> 217.1.1.1 nat to 10.1.1.1 in VRF A
>> 217.1.1.1 nat to 192.168.1.1 in VRF B
>>
>> I can't see any reason why not.
>>
>> What about if using VRF-Lite on a 3845, does that make any difference?
>>
>> Its a funny question but I have been asked this and have no access to the
>> kit to prove it working and I have to have a solid answer.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Gary
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.8.0/1717 - Release Date: 10/9/2008 4:56 PM
>
>