[c-nsp] 6500 and MPLS

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 05:20:59PM +0100, Gary Roberton wrote:
> Is anyone currently using a 6500 for MPLS duties?  Not VRF-Lite but PE
> duties (including NAT)?  If so, what are the pros and cons you have
> experienced.

PE yes, NAT no.  Works.  

Sup720-3B or better - no MPLS with Sup1 or Sup2.

(The usual caveats apply, regarding 6500/7600 and Cisco BUs that should 
be making you a happy customer but are preferring to fight other BUs 
instead.  To hell with them all.)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20081014/29dc3987/attachment.bin>