[c-nsp] OSPF fast hellos
Rodney Dunn
rodunn at cisco.com
Wed Oct 29 09:10:46 EDT 2008
Why don't you use BFD instead. It's designed with something called
pseudo preemption from an OS scheduler perspective that helps
reduce false positives and the fact that BFD frames are handled
under interrupt and not process scheduled for rx/tx.
Rodney
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:45PM +1030, Ben Steele wrote:
> Anyone currently using this in a fairly demanding environment? Ie 5-10Gbs+
> Campus/DC model.
>
>
>
> Curious as to whether you've had any/many false dead peers with such a short
> interval, subsecond dead peer detection does sound very temping though.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Ben
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list