[c-nsp] OSPF fast hellos

[Tim Jackson]

When is BFD going to not be limited to 7600/12k/CRS?

And when can we get BFD on an SVI (or back on an SVI, iirc SRB supports
this, but SRC doesn't?) or a port-channel?

Until Cisco actually has BFD working on more than a few platforms, I'll
stick with fast hellos since it seems to work on more platforms and in more
configurations...

--
Tim

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Rodney Dunn <rodunn at cisco.com> wrote:

> Why don't you use BFD instead. It's designed with something called
> pseudo preemption from an OS scheduler perspective that helps
> reduce false positives and the fact that BFD frames are handled
> under interrupt and not process scheduled for rx/tx.
>
> Rodney
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:45PM +1030, Ben Steele wrote:
> > Anyone currently using this in a fairly demanding environment? Ie
> 5-10Gbs+
> > Campus/DC model.
> >
> >
> >
> > Curious as to whether you've had any/many false dead peers with such a
> short
> > interval, subsecond dead peer detection does sound very temping though.
> >
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> >
> > Ben
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>