[c-nsp] OSPF fast hellos

[Rodney Dunn]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:40:16AM -0500, Tim Jackson wrote:
> When is BFD going to not be limited to 7600/12k/CRS?
>

It's on the ISR's.
Other support (ie: WAN interfaces) are in the works.
 
> And when can we get BFD on an SVI (or back on an SVI, iirc SRB supports this,
> but SRC doesn't?) or a port-channel?

Haven't checked on that.

> 
> Until Cisco actually has BFD working on more than a few platforms, I'll stick
> with fast hellos since it seems to work on more platforms and in more
> configurations...

That's fair.

Rodney


> 
> --
> Tim
> 
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Rodney Dunn <rodunn at cisco.com> wrote:
> 
>     Why don't you use BFD instead. It's designed with something called
>     pseudo preemption from an OS scheduler perspective that helps
>     reduce false positives and the fact that BFD frames are handled
>     under interrupt and not process scheduled for rx/tx.
>    
>     Rodney
>    
>     On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 04:09:45PM +1030, Ben Steele wrote:
>     > Anyone currently using this in a fairly demanding environment? Ie
>     5-10Gbs+
>     > Campus/DC model.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Curious as to whether you've had any/many false dead peers with such a
>     short
>     > interval, subsecond dead peer detection does sound very temping though.
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Cheers
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > Ben
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>     > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>     > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>     _______________________________________________
>     cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>     archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
>