[c-nsp] RES: Cisco Catalyst 6513 IOS version

[Pete S.]

We've been running a mix od SXF, and SXH (un)fortunately.

SXF is pretty solid.  If you don't have any features(like VPN,
adjust-mss specifically), or modules which require an SXH train(i.e.
6716) I'd suggest you stick with safe harbor SXF.

The biggest running issue I have with SXH, is not containing the ISSU
capability in the non-modular flavor.  Modular still makes me nervous
for production.

 --Pete

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:47 AM,  <A.L.M.Buxey at lboro.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> we've got a 12.2(33)SXH3 box up and alive now - so far so much
>>> better than SXH2 (and 2b) but we've yet to drive packets through
>>> in anger.  certainly looks like we might be SXH'd by the new year
>>> (but dont quote me on that! ;-) )
>>
>> Just don't try and "scp" anything from it...
>
> 8-) dont worry - i saw _that_ posting. anything with SXH
> in the subject line right now gets my immediate attention
> (remember that spammers.... ;-) )
>
> alan
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>