[c-nsp] Dreaded FIB Exception on Sup2

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 09:53:02PM +0200, Christian Bering wrote:
> Yeah but since the list price for the RSP720-3CXL is the same as the
> list price for the SUP720-3BXL, I don't see a reason not to go for the
> RSP. Does one exist?

The RSP is made by the business unit inside Cisco that brought us the
dreaded "SR IOS for 7600 will not run on 6500 chassis" annoyance.  Vote
with your money.

Besides, if you happen to *have* a 6500 chassis, the RSP won't work there.

(Not that there is any difference between a 6500 and a 7600, besides
the color of the metal and the EEPROM programming... thankyouverymuch)

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080904/2725a116/attachment-0001.bin>