[c-nsp] silly qos question

Mike Louis MLouis at nwnit.com
Thu Sep 4 07:42:22 EDT 2008


I usually set the max reserve command to 95 percent to leave room for routing and other overhead. That way I don't have to specify a specific class to take care of it if I reserve akll remaining bw in the pm

-----Original Message-----
From: Johannes Resch <jr at xor.at>
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 5:43 AM
To: Ryan <ryanclambert at gmail.com>
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] silly qos question


On Thu, September 4, 2008 09:07, Ryan wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Quick QoS question here. I seem to be having some trouble getting a policy
> applied to a Serial (T1) interface, and for the life of me don’t
> understand why. I’m pretty sure it’s my fault and not a “feature”.
>
> Error I am getting when I try to apply the service policy direction
> output:
>
> %INTERFACE_NAME% class Data-DSCP requested bandwidth 750 (kbps) Available
> only 656 (kbps)

Did you set "max-reserved-bandwidth" to 100% on the interface?

Regards,
-jr
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/


Note: This message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, legally privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify the original sender immediately by telephone or return email and destroy or delete this message along with any attachments immediately.



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list