[c-nsp] Dreaded FIB Exception on Sup2

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:21:37AM -0400, Rich Davies wrote:
> Has anyone ever utilized Unicast RPF (reverse path forwarding) to help
> mitigate this limitation on the SUP2's?   I have also ran into the same
> limitation with our SUP2's (full BGP routing table, multiple peering
> sessions) and I have read that enabling Unicast RPF would help temporarily
> alleviate the TCAM memory being exhausted 

You have read funny stuff.  Enabling uRPF on the SUP2 *halves* the
available TCAM space, to 128k routes.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080904/a1004a45/attachment.bin>