[c-nsp] Dreaded FIB Exception on Sup2
Gert Doering
gert at greenie.muc.de
Thu Sep 4 09:23:39 EDT 2008
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 09:21:37AM -0400, Rich Davies wrote:
> Has anyone ever utilized Unicast RPF (reverse path forwarding) to help
> mitigate this limitation on the SUP2's? I have also ran into the same
> limitation with our SUP2's (full BGP routing table, multiple peering
> sessions) and I have read that enabling Unicast RPF would help temporarily
> alleviate the TCAM memory being exhausted
You have read funny stuff. Enabling uRPF on the SUP2 *halves* the
available TCAM space, to 128k routes.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080904/a1004a45/attachment.bin>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list