[c-nsp] BGP Route Selection

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday 10 September 2008 11:44:45 Gregory Boehnlein 
wrote:

> Can someone explain
> to me the reason why Path #3 is being chosen over the
> lower AS-Path #1 and #2 routing choices?

Path 3 is the best because it has a higher LOCAL_PREF value 
(150) vs. that from paths 1 and 2.

Cheers,

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20080910/a507a48f/attachment.bin>