[c-nsp] SRC2?

[Rinse Kloek (Solcon)]

This puzzles me. I do policy routing met set VRF. However it looks like 
still the global routing table is used:

Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, PBR Counted
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy routed set vrf
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy match
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy routed set vrf
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
d=192.168.10.1, len 84, input feature, Policy Routing(49), rtype 0, 
forus FALSE, sendself FALSE0
Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
d=192.168.10.1 (GigabitEthernet0/1), routed via FIB

First messages say that set vrf is matched. However the last line just 
implies it goes throug the global routing table.
GigabitEthernet0/1 is the default gateway of the global routing table.

kind regards Rinse

Rodney Dunn schreef:
> What I'm saying is if you are seeing the problem on SRC1 it can't
> be CSCsk27643.
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:59:19PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote:
>   
>> I tried this feature on a 7200 with SRC1 (also on SB6). (SRB does not 
>> run on 7200).
>>
>> regards Rinse
>>
>> Rodney Dunn schreef:
>>     
>>> It's already fixed in SRC and SRB4.
>>>
>>> That bug was only an issue in SRA throttle.
>>>
>>> Have you tried SRB4?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote:
>>>  
>>>       
>>>> We are also running in some bug ( CSCsk27643 ) and are hoping to see 
>>>> this fixed in SRC2. Anybody some tips to get PBR using set vrf working 
>>>> on a 12.2 release ?
>>>>
>>>> regards Rinse
>>>> cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>    
>>>>         
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bas Roos <cisco-nsp at gatlan.nl> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>      
>>>>>           
>>>>>>> Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, specifically
>>>>>>> for the 7600.  I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release.
>>>>>>>     
>>>>>>>          
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>      
>>>>>           
>>>>>> The latest statement we got from them was end-september.
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>        
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Anyone from Cisco perhaps would comment on this?
>>>>> CSCso45720 makes it really problematic to go into production stage
>>>>> with the SRC train.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ran.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>>
>>>>>      
>>>>>           
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>>>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>>>    
>>>>         
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>