[c-nsp] SRC2?

[Rodney Dunn]

Show me your configuration.

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:55:46PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote:
> This puzzles me. I do policy routing met set VRF. However it looks like 
> still the global routing table is used:
> 
> Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
> d=192.168.10.1, len 84, PBR Counted
> Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
> d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy routed set vrf
> Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
> d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy match
> Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
> d=192.168.10.1, len 84, FIB policy routed set vrf
> Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
> d=192.168.10.1, len 84, input feature, Policy Routing(49), rtype 0, 
> forus FALSE, sendself FALSE0
> Sep 19 20:48:12.439: IP: tableid=0, s=192.168.0.2 (GigabitEthernet0/2), 
> d=192.168.10.1 (GigabitEthernet0/1), routed via FIB
> 
> First messages say that set vrf is matched. However the last line just 
> implies it goes throug the global routing table.
> GigabitEthernet0/1 is the default gateway of the global routing table.
> 
> kind regards Rinse
> 
> Rodney Dunn schreef:
> >What I'm saying is if you are seeing the problem on SRC1 it can't
> >be CSCsk27643.
> >
> >On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:59:19PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote:
> >  
> >>I tried this feature on a 7200 with SRC1 (also on SB6). (SRB does not 
> >>run on 7200).
> >>
> >>regards Rinse
> >>
> >>Rodney Dunn schreef:
> >>    
> >>>It's already fixed in SRC and SRB4.
> >>>
> >>>That bug was only an issue in SRA throttle.
> >>>
> >>>Have you tried SRB4?
> >>>
> >>>On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 09:07:16PM +0200, Rinse Kloek (Solcon) wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>      
> >>>>We are also running in some bug ( CSCsk27643 ) and are hoping to see 
> >>>>this fixed in SRC2. Anybody some tips to get PBR using set vrf working 
> >>>>on a 12.2 release ?
> >>>>
> >>>>regards Rinse
> >>>>cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>>>   
> >>>>        
> >>>>>Hi All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 6:35 PM, Bas Roos <cisco-nsp at gatlan.nl> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>>>Anyone know when 12.2(33)SRC2 is supposed to be released, 
> >>>>>>>specifically
> >>>>>>>for the 7600.  I had heard by the end of July, but so far no release.
> >>>>>>>    
> >>>>>>>         
> >>>>>>>              
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>>>The latest statement we got from them was end-september.
> >>>>>>  
> >>>>>>       
> >>>>>>            
> >>>>>Anyone from Cisco perhaps would comment on this?
> >>>>>CSCso45720 makes it really problematic to go into production stage
> >>>>>with the SRC train.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Cheers,
> >>>>>--
> >>>>>Ran.
> >>>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     
> >>>>>          
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>>>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>>>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>>>   
> >>>>        
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>