[c-nsp] carrier router models comparison
Mateusz Blaszczyk
blahu77 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 15:33:09 EDT 2009
Okay,
But if I imagine crs-1 (my favorite example) with same limitation
(currently) of 40g per slot I don't see how it is 100G ready. Some say
that its because they will introduce 100g switching matrix
concurrently to new 100 LC, I am not 100% conviced that it satisfies
"100G ready" label. For me ready is now, crs-1/7600 is 40g ready but
not 100g.
It may never be.
That's why I don't understand position of this platform comparing to asr9k...
Best Regards,
-mat
2009/4/13 Walter Keen <walter.keen at rainierconnect.net>:
> Backplane speed per slot I would imagine.
>
> Imagine the 7600 and it's 10-port 10Ge card. If it only has 40gb on
> the backplane or fabric for that slot... well... lets hope all 10 ports
> aren't utilized to 100% at all times, It's a little over 2:1
> over-subscription for the example I gave.
>
> Mateusz Blaszczyk wrote:
>> What's the difference between 40g/slot and 100g/slot ready ?
>> Is it like "vista ready"?
>>
>> I would assume (wrongly?) that this is a hw limit?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> -mat
>>
>>
>
>
--
pgp-key 0x1C655CAB
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list