[c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

[Arie Vayner (avayner)]

Tasso,

What are you trying to achieve?

Arie

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tassos
Chatzithomaoglou
Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 20:04
To: cisco-nsp
Subject: [c-nsp] EoMPLS between subinterface and physical interface

I'm reading under EoMPLS Guidelines and Restrictions
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/7600/ios/12.2SR/configuration/gu
ide/pfc3mpls.html#wp1109041

======================================
For a particular EoMPLS connection, both the ingress EoMPLS interface on
the ingress PE and the egress EoMPLS interface 
on the egress PE have to be subinterfaces with dot1Q encapsulation or
neither is a subinterface.
======================================

So, i guess in PFC-based EoMPLS you can't have a subinterface on one
side (vlan mode) and a physical interface (port 
mode) on the other side.

Besides using ES/SPA cards and scalable EoMPLS on both sides, is there
another solution?

What about scalable EoMPLS on one side and PFC-based EoMPLS (vlan or
port mode) on the other? Has anyone tried it?

--
Tassos
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/