[c-nsp] IPV6 in general was Re: Large networks

[Daniel Verlouw]

On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 21:23 +0100, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> > Some of us would disagree rather strongly with one or more of those
> > points. For instance, for us DHCPv6 is a hard requirement.
> > 
> Why the hard requirement?

DHCPv6 prefix delegation. And DNS assignment. And a bunch of other
parameters SLAAC forgot to include. (does anyone actually implement RFC
5006 yet?)

   --Daniel.