[c-nsp] Is annual reloads of Cisco 6500 necessary

[e ninja]

Totally concur. If it's not broken, don't fix it.

*All* new bugs are introduced into software inadvertently while fixing
existing bugs or implementing new features.

/eninja



On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:44:39AM -0800, Thilak T wrote:
> > How important or significant is to schedule reloads of Data Center
> /Campus
> > switches with uptime over 1 year ? What is the logic/reason behind this
> > advice from Cisco.
>
> We never reload anything, unless a *specific* reason exists - e.g.
> "software
> update unavoidable" or "device misbehaving and we can't find any non-reload
> way to mitigate".
>
> gert
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                           //
> www.muc.de/~gert/ <http://www.muc.de/%7Egert/>
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> gert at greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025
> gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>