[c-nsp] Is annual reloads of Cisco 6500 necessary

[Erik Fairbanks]

Similar to how a light bulb doesn't break until it is turned off and turned
back on :)

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:01 AM, e ninja <eninja at gmail.com> wrote:

> Totally concur. If it's not broken, don't fix it.
>
> *All* new bugs are introduced into software inadvertently while fixing
> existing bugs or implementing new features.
>
> /eninja
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Gert Doering <gert at greenie.muc.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:44:39AM -0800, Thilak T wrote:
> > > How important or significant is to schedule reloads of Data Center
> > /Campus
> > > switches with uptime over 1 year ? What is the logic/reason behind this
> > > advice from Cisco.
> >
> > We never reload anything, unless a *specific* reason exists - e.g.
> > "software
> > update unavoidable" or "device misbehaving and we can't find any
> non-reload
> > way to mitigate".
> >
> > gert
> > --
> > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> >                                                           //
> > www.muc.de/~gert/ <http://www.muc.de/%7Egert/> <
> http://www.muc.de/%7Egert/>
> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany
> > gert at greenie.muc.de
> > fax: +49-89-35655025
> > gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>