[c-nsp] Ring Protocol

[harbor235]

Thank you for all your replies, that was exactly what I was looking for.

mike

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:37 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:

> A little bird from C whispered me the following:
>
> "I'd take a look at the ME-4924-10GE device (REP Supports ~50ms
> failover), as well as this you have support for it on the larger devices
> like the 7600.
>
> 4924 support for REP started in 12.2(44)SG -
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps4324/product_bulletin_c25_468227.html
>
> 7600 has supported REP since 12.2(33)SRC -
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/lanswitch/configuration/guide/lsw_cfg_rep.html
> "
>
> I stand corrected.
>
>
> Rubens
>
> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Rubens Kuhl <rubensk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think Cisco currently have an 10G ethernet ring offer. It
> > might come up when REP (Resilient Ethernet Protocol) gets implemented
> > in the 6500 IOS. It was supposed to be on SXI, but that didn't happen.
> > If 2G is enough, ME-3400G-12CS-x with 4 SFP uplinks might do Gigabit
> > Etherchannel, perhaps ?
> >
> > Outside of Cisco-land, Extreme, Foundry and Force 10 seems to have
> > currently shipping solutions.
> >
> >
> > Rubens
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:21 PM, harbor235 <harbor235 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I am looking to deploy a Ethernet Ring topology in a campus. The ring is
> to
> >> connect
> >> multiple buildings via a high speed 10G backbone. Does Cisco offer any
> >> products in this
> >> area? The ONS is too expensive, looking for something smaller that is
> >> Ethernet based.
> >>
> >>
> >> mike
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> >
>