[c-nsp] PBR on a 6.5K

[Dan Pinkard]

Thanks!

It certainly happily accepts the command, and even does the right thing for the first few kpps. After that, not so much, which is where the whole question began. It just does so poorly that it never catches up...



________________________________
From: Tim Stevenson [mailto:tstevens at cisco.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 12:24 PM
To: Dan Pinkard; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] PBR on a 6.5K

IIRC, 6500 does not support PBR with the recursive next hops, you must specify a directly connected next hop that you have a resolved adj for.

Tim

At 11:47 AM 2/25/2009, Dan Pinkard stated:


What are the resource limitations on policy routing on SUP720s/MSFC3? Are the flows ultimately process switched every time or will it draw from the route-cache?

We were toying with a very simple route-map that called for both a next-hop and a recursive next-hop route. A moderate (20mbps/14kpps) traffic level pegged the cpu and send IQD counters sky-high. Which leads to the basic question of what went wrong?

Any ideas or observations from your own tests?

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/





Tim Stevenson, tstevens at cisco.com
Routing & Switching CCIE #5561
Technical Marketing Engineer, Cisco Nexus 7000
Cisco - http://www.cisco.com
<http://www.cisco.com/>IP Phone: 408-526-6759
********************************************************
The contents of this message may be *Cisco Confidential*
and are intended for the specified recipients only.