[c-nsp] EoMPLS from ME3750 to 7201 GigE sub-int

[Rado Vasilev]

Justin,

You should be able to fix the MTU mismatch issue without changing the  
interface/sub-interface MTU.
conf t
interface xxx/x.10
  xconnect ..
     mtu xxx


regards,
Rado


On 18 Jan 2009, at 01:41, Justin Shore wrote:

> Chris Phillips wrote:
>> The MTU definitely needs to be the same, in my experience.   
>> However, I am somewhat new to MPLS and am very much still in the  
>> learning process.  But, that would be the first thing that I would  
>> change.
>
> I'm in the same boat for L2VPNs.  I have somewhat better knowledge  
> of L3VPNs at this point.  We're just now really diving into L2VPNs.
>
> I did change the MTU and that fixed it.  That presents a design  
> issue for me which I detailed in a self-reply to the list.  I'm now  
> trying to figure out what best practice is for EoMPLS on sub-ints  
> when the sub-int involves customer and infrastructure VLANs.  The  
> best answer may be to not mix them.  Thoughts?
>
> Thanks
> Justin
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/