[c-nsp] MPLS Question - Applying QoS using MQC

[Andy Saykao]

Hi All,
 
I have just have a few questions about MQC and how to use the class-map
match command to match incoming traffic from MPLS VPN customers at the
PE so that we can apply the correct QoS treatment.
 
1/ Match Sub-Interfaces ???
 
For example, we have some MPLS VPN customers that are connected via
sub-interfaces (eg: Gi0/1.902) and the class-map match command doens't
allow you to match on sub-interfaces. Any ideas on how to match traffic
from sub-interfaces?
 
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.902
 description PE to CE_CUST_A_1
 encapsulation dot1Q 902
 ip vrf forwarding NSTEST
 ip address 10.15.99.9 255.255.255.252
!
test-mpls-cr(config)#class-map match-all TEST
test-mpls-cr(config-cmap)#match input-interface gigabitEthernet 0/1.902
                                                                   ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
 
Can we just match on VLAN instead???
 
test-mpls-cr(config)#class-map match-all TEST
test-mpls-cr(config-cmap)#match input-interface vlan ?
  <1-4095>  Vlan interface number


2/ Match ADSL ???
 
Some MPLS VPN customers are also connected via ADSL (PPPoX) and get
placed in the corresponding VRF by radius. How do we perform a match on
these MPLS VPN customers that are connecting via ADSL? 
 
I see that we can match on virtual-template but currently all of our
ADSL subscribers use the same virtual-template.
 
test-mpls-cr(config)#class-map match-all TEST
test-mpls-cr(config-cmap)#match input-interface virtual-template ?
  <1-1000>  Virtual-Template interface number
 
If I set up a new virtual-template for MPLS VPN customers this might
work, but then not all ADSL MPLSVPN customers will want to pay for QoS,
so I guess we will have to create TWO new virtual-templates (one for
those MPLS VPN customers who want QoS and the other for customers who
don't want to pay for QoS). Any others ideas on how this can be
accomplised?
 
3/ Match ATM interfaces???
 
How do I match MPLS VPN customers that are connected via ATM???

interface ATM1/0.304470 point-to-point
 bandwidth 2048
 ip vrf forwarding NSTEST
 ip address 10.15.100.1 255.255.255.252
 ip flow ingress
 atm route-bridged ip
 no atm enable-ilmi-trap
 pvc 10/100
  ubr 2048
  encapsulation aal5snap

Given that MPLS VPN customer's can use overlapping IP addresses, I don't
think we can match on source or destination IP addresses.
 
Thanks.
 
Andy

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
 solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
Please notify the sender immediately by email if you have received this 
email by mistake and delete this email from your system. Please note that
 any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
 author and do not necessarily represent those of the organisation. 
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for 
the presence of viruses. The organisation accepts no liability for any 
damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.