[c-nsp] edge router BGP

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:20:50PM -0500, Justin Shore wrote:
> It has 5x the backplane to boot plus it's hardware forwarding.  The only 
> real downside IMHO is that the unit uses SPAs which require SmartNets 
> per SPA (per license and per a lot of other things for that matter too). 

Uh.  Could you elaborate on that?  Especially the "per-license and a lot
of other things" bit?

We have no ASR1k yet, but if something like the ES20 "extra license for
IPv6 *per ES20 card*" is going to come back, this would be a strong reason
to finally go to the Vendor J camp.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090718/097f175a/attachment.bin>