[c-nsp] OSPF NSSA question
Ivan Pepelnjak
ip at ioshints.info
Thu Jul 23 14:49:38 EDT 2009
Hi!
You gave me a good reason to finally test this command and document what it
does and how it's used in a hub-and-spoke environment:
http://wiki.nil.com/OSPF_flooding_filters_in_hub-and-spoke_environment
It's exactly what's needed to solve the original problem (but of course you
need a static default route on the spoke routers as they lose all OSPF
information).
Best regards
Ivan
http://www.ioshints.info/about
http://blog.ioshints.info/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ruben Alvarez [mailto:raa at opusnet.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:17 PM
> To: 'Mateusz Blaszczyk'; 'Ivan Pepelnjak'
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] OSPF NSSA question
>
> I'm not sure filtering 'out' would work. Three routers all
> have one interface, each connecting to the ABR (which has
> four interfaces, three to the routers in area 1 and one in
> area 0.) If I'm filtering out, The ABR wouldn't know which
> routes are on each of the three routers. Right? The three
> routers have thousands of single host routes spread out over
> each router. The ABR knows which router has each host and
> summarizes to area 0.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mateusz Blaszczyk [mailto:blahu77 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 1:10 AM
> To: Ivan Pepelnjak
> Cc: Ruben Alvarez; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPF NSSA question
>
> 2009/7/22 Ivan Pepelnjak <ip at ioshints.info>:
> > You're probably looking for the "ip ospf database-filter
> all out" command.
>
> And how the summary LSA with 0/0 would get to the spoke
> router if that is filtered out?
> (assuming nssa scenario in OP's hub n'spoke topology)
>
> Best Regards,
>
> -mat
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list