[c-nsp] BFD + BGP on 7600 SRC or SRD

[Justin Shore]

The response I got when I asked was that it was an "unintended feature". 
  That may be the case but it was working just fine.  I wish they'd add 
the feature.  It's really important for 7600s that serve access 
functions along with core/distribution functions.  The only other 
solution is to burn additional ports to separate the 1Q trunk between 
pairs of chassis for access VLANs (running a FHRP across the pair of 
7600s) and a separate pair of interfaces for the L3 relationship between 
the chassis.

Justin



Dean Smith wrote:
> So I can only have BFD + eBGP if its on a physical port ?
> 
> Does the same apply to SVI + OSPF ?
> 
> Any known reason for this limitiation ?
> 
> (Waiting for my test 7606s to arrive!)
> Dean
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Shore" <justin at justinshore.com>
> To: "Walter Keen" <walter.keen at rainierconnect.net>
> Cc: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 4:27 AM
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BFD + BGP on 7600 SRC or SRD
> 
> 
>> Walter Keen wrote:
>>> Hi, I'm looking at using BFD with BGP on 7600's (rsp720's and 
>>> sup720-3b) and was wondering if there were any known issues with 
>>> certain IOS's in the SRC or SRD train.
>>
>> BFD support for SVIs was removed with SRB2 if that's something that 
>> you think you'll need.
>>
>> Justin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>> __________ NOD32 4289 (20090729) Information __________
>>
>> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>