[c-nsp] IPV6 implementation

[TJ]

Short answer - it depends.

Quick thoughts:
	1) SLAAC can suffice, assuming IPv4 is present to "cheat" off of for
DNS/name resolution.  
	   Or if/when RFC5006 gets more widely supported.
	
	2) Maybe, see next comment :).
	
	3) DHCPv6 client and server support is not exactly 100% available on
all platforms, atleast 
	   not natively (3rd party apps exist, e.g. - Dibbler).  Many
routers currently support 
	   stateless DHCPv6 server functionality only ... not stateful.


HTH!
/TJ


>-----Original Message-----
>From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-
>bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Renelson Panosky
>Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:45 AM
>To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>Subject: [c-nsp] IPV6 implementation
>
>I am getting ready to start running IPV6 on my core routers, i have a
couple
>questions for the people who already have IPV6 running
>
>1. Should I let computers determine their own IPV6 addresses ?
>
>2. Should I procure IPV6 DHCP Appliance ?
>
>or
>
>3. Should i configure my router to act as the IPV6 DHCP Servers?
>
>
>
>Renelson
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/