[c-nsp] 7600 router and Etherchannel across multiple line card
Paul Stewart
paul at paulstewart.org
Sun Jun 7 20:10:30 EDT 2009
Apologies for bumping the post....
My notes show the following:
WS-X6148A-GE-TX
*Number of ports: 48
Number of port groups: 6
Port ranges per port group: 1-8, 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 41-48 *The
aggregate bandwidth of each port group is 1 Gbps.
WS-X6148-GE-TX
*Number of ports: 48
Number of port groups: 2
Port ranges per port group: 1-24, 25-48
Note WS-X6148-GE-TX, WS-X6148V-GE-TX, and WS-X6148-GE-45AF do not
support these features:
*More than 1 Gbps of traffic per EtherChannel
Sorry, I was thinking 6148A and the OP has specified the non-A version hence
the confusion on my part...
Thanks,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Peter Rathlev
Sent: June 7, 2009 8:01 PM
To: Ibrahim Abo Zaid
Cc: cisco_nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 7600 router and Etherchannel across multiple line card
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 02:09 +0300, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote:
> I am trying to establish L2 Etherchannel between 2 7609 routers ,
> SUP720-MSFC3 , PFC is 3BXL and Line cards WS-X6148-GE and IOS is *
> 12.2(33)SRD*
>
> are there any concerns to establish this etherchannel between ports in
> different line cards ?
Etherchannels are a little pointless on the WS-X6148-GE card and
similiar. They have 1GB/s ASICs, so you'll never exceed 1GB/s anyhow.
And the ASIC to physical port ratio also limits you.
But generally speaking, cross module etherchannels are a good idea and
AFAIK is recommended from Cisco for high availability.
Regards,
Peter
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list