[c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis

[Antonio Soares]

Why are you not including E4 or E4+ ? I'm asking this because i saw a E4 hitting the maximum when the number of CEF routes handled
doubled (from 280k to 560k). To the E3, this transition was smooth... And i'm not able to find docs that could explain this...


Thanks.

Regards,

Antonio Soares, CCIE #18473 (R&S)
amsoares at netcabo.pt

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Roland Dobbins
Sent: quinta-feira, 18 de Junho de 2009 1:55
To: Cisco-nsp
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis


On Jun 18, 2009, at 6:59 AM, Jo Rhett wrote:

> I'd prefer something that can handle both edge and core duties.

GSR w/E3 or E5 LCs, CRS-1, or ASR 1K.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

         Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well.

		   -- Kevin Lawton

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/