[c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis
Roland Dobbins
rdobbins at arbor.net
Thu Jun 18 07:04:22 EDT 2009
On Jun 18, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Antonio Soares wrote:
> Why are you not including E4 or E4+ ?
Because those are intended to be deployed as coreward-facing cards,
they aren't optimized for edge features like NetFlow, uRPF, and ACLs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well.
-- Kevin Lawton
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list