[c-nsp] full routing table / provider-class chassis

Roland Dobbins rdobbins at arbor.net
Thu Jun 18 07:04:22 EDT 2009


On Jun 18, 2009, at 5:48 PM, Antonio Soares wrote:

> Why are you not including E4 or E4+ ?

Because those are intended to be deployed as coreward-facing cards,  
they aren't optimized for edge features like NetFlow, uRPF, and ACLs.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>

         Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well.

		   -- Kevin Lawton



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list