[c-nsp] L2TPv3 and VLANs

[Ge Moua]

 > How do I make this happen on the HQ router?

Each l2tp tunnel will have its own vc:  "sh l2tun all"

You obviously have thoughts this all out as your logic for how it will 
and should work is sound.

We are doing a very similar setup over here at the UofMn and this is 
working well for us.


Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0100 at umn.edu

Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services



Ziv Leyes wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to make sure this following scenario can work.
> 3 remote sites, one is the HQ which has a switch that handles 2 vlans, let's say vlan 10 and vlan 20.
> The other two branches needs to be connected to the HQ and have a flat LAN between them and the HQ, but each branch to it's own vlan, branch 1 to vlan 10 and branch 2 to vlan 20. They must NOT see each other's traffic.
> Every site has a switch and a router (C2801 I think) Is it possible to do?
> If yes, then I was thinking about L2TPv3, but in this case I'd need to make two different xconnections between HQ-->Branch 1 and HQ-->Branch 2.
> How do I make this happen on the HQ router? I was thinking to bring the vlans via a trunk from the switch and then finishing them on sub-interfaces with dot1q and then xconnecting the sob-interface to each l2tp tunnel to each respective branch. Is it correct or there is a better way?
>
> Will this work?
>
> Thanks in advance for your help
> Ziv
>
>
>  
>  
> ************************************************************************************
> This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
> PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
> ************************************************************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>