[c-nsp] x6148 vs. x6548
Kevin Graham
kgraham at industrial-marshmallow.com
Mon Jun 22 12:37:56 EDT 2009
> You are correct. That only applies to the 6148. Originally it also
> applied to the 6548 as well, but that limitation was removed later by
> s/w optimizations in the LTL programming scheme. So you *can* get
> more than 1G thru an etherchannel with 6548s, but of course, you
> still can only get 1G max thru a given port group on the card.
Does it hold though that etherchannel traffic gets replicated to all
modules with bundle members? (ie. does a bundle spanning two 6724's
consume bandwidth on both module's fabric connections, irrespective
of the egress port?) Would this also be true for ports behind
different fabrics of a dual fabric card (ie. opposite ends of a
6748)?
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list