[c-nsp] passive-interface on VRF-specific OSPF process

[Roman A. Nozdrin]

Lukas Garberg wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> while configuring an OSPF process for a VRF on a Cisco 3550-12G
> (running 12.2(25)SE) I notice that the command "passive-interface"
> is unavailable. How can this be? Is there another way I can suppress
> routing updates on an interface?

You can put actual network commands in ospf configuration section. For 
example:

network 172.16.8.1 0.0.0.0
network 172.17.0.30 0.0.0.0
network 172.17.0.242 0.0.0.0

It will activate interfaces in the target VRF only. You can redistribute 
  any other routes you need to announce.

WBR
Roman A. Nozdrin

> Relevant parts of the configuration:
> !
> ip vrf SAN
> rd 29468:1
> !
> interface Loopback1
> ip vrf forwarding SAN
> ip address 172.17.0.242 255.255.255.255
> !
> interface Vlan390
> ip vrf forwarding SAN
> ip address 172.17.0.30 255.255.255.252
> !        interface Vlan391
> ip vrf forwarding SAN
> ip address 172.16.8.1 255.255.252.0
> !        router ospf 64512 vrf SAN
> log-adjacency-changes
> auto-cost reference-bandwidth 10000
> capability vrf-lite
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> network 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 area 0
> !
> 
> Regards,
> Lukas Garberg
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>