[c-nsp] passive-interface on VRF-specific OSPF process

[Manu Chao]

type-2 ;)

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Ivan Pepelnjak <ip at ioshints.info> wrote:

> > > while configuring an OSPF process for a VRF on a Cisco 3550-12G
> > > (running 12.2(25)SE) I notice that the command "passive-interface"
> > > is unavailable. How can this be? Is there another way I can
> > suppress
> > > routing updates on an interface?
> >
> > You can put actual network commands in ospf configuration section. For
> > example:
> >
> > network 172.16.8.1 0.0.0.0
> > network 172.17.0.30 0.0.0.0
> > network 172.17.0.242 0.0.0.0
> >
> > It will activate interfaces in the target VRF only. You can
> > redistribute
> >   any other routes you need to announce.
>
> ... And we're back to the neverending question: ignoring the obvious
> implications for stub areas, is it better to advertise connected subnets as
> parts of router (type-1) LSA or as individual external (type-5) routes?
>
> Any thoughts or preferences?
> Ivan
>
> http://www.ioshints.info/about
> http://blog.ioshints.info/
>
> _______________________________________________
>  cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>