[c-nsp] L2TPv3 "LNS mode"
Ge Moua
moua0100 at umn.edu
Wed Mar 18 17:36:38 EDT 2009
One could send this over vanilla crypto IPSec; IPSec is routable. We
are doing this over here.
Regards,
Ge Moua | Email: moua0100 at umn.edu
Network Design Engineer
University of Minnesota | Networking & Telecommunications Services
Gabor Ivanszky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there any possibility to route(L3 process) Ethernet encapsulated IP
> packets arriving at a Cisco router in a L2TPv3 tunnel?
>
> In other words, is it possible to configure a Cisco box in LNS role in
> an Ethernet L2TPv3 setup?
>
> " L2TP Network Server (LNS)
>
> If a given L2TP session is terminated at the L2TP node and the
> encapsulated network layer (L3) packet processed on a virtual
> interface, we refer to this L2TP node as an L2TP Network Server" (RFC3931)
>
> Actually i'd like to implement "(a) LAC-LNS Reference Model:
>
> On one side, the LAC receives traffic
> from an L2 circuit, which it forwards via L2TP across an IP or other
> packet-based network. On the other side, an LNS logically terminates
> the L2 circuit locally and routes network traffic to the home
> network. The action of session establishment is driven by the LAC
> (as an incoming call) or the LNS (as an outgoing call).
>
> +-----+ L2 +-----+ +-----+
> | |------| LAC |.........[ IP ].........| LNS |...[home network]
> +-----+ +-----+ +-----+
> remote
> system
> |<-- emulated service -->|
> |<----------- L2 service ------------>| "(RFC3931)
>
> Practically an Ethernet interface with an xconnect setting on "LAC"
> side, and something like an IP tunnel interface on the "LNS" side.
>
> The obvious
>
> interface Tunnel1
> tunnel mode l2tpv3
>
> doesn't exist.
>
>
> cheers,
> Gabor
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list