[c-nsp] ASR - modular image
Pshem Kowalczyk
pshem.k at gmail.com
Tue Mar 24 19:59:46 EDT 2009
Hi,
Thank you for the off-list replies. I've read some more documentation
regarding the ASRs and I'm a bit unsure what the advantages of running
a sub-packaged image are. According to the Cisco website:
" Individual sub-package upgrades are atypical on the Cisco ASR 1000
Series Routers, because it is very rare to experience a case where a
single sub-package is upgraded without upgrading all the sub-packages
from the consolidated package. Individual sub-package upgrades are
most useful when only a single sub-package of an otherwise functioning
set of sub-packages requires an upgrade. "
which leaves me even more perplexed about the usefulness of the
'sub-packaged' version.
kind regards
Pshem
2009/3/25 Pshem Kowalczyk <pshem.k at gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> We're considering getting some ASR (1004 and 1006) as peering routers.
> I would like to know what sort of experience you had with them.
> What are the advantages of running the 'modular' IOS XE? We tried the
> 'modular' software on 6500 and we ran into some issues that we didn't
> have on the integrated one.
> Should we expect something similar from the ASR platform?
>
> regards
> Pshem
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list