[c-nsp] Multichassis Multilink PPP

[Ben Steele]

Do you control both ends of the link(s)? any reason you can't just run L3
without PPP on the links with a routing protocol for redundancy and use
cef's load sharing abilities?

I'd avoid the overhead and processing requirements of MMP if you can.


On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:21 AM, James Edmondson <biged7600 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Question for the pros.
>
> Need advise on having multiple (2 right now and separate carriers, 6 in the
> future) T1's spread across two 7606 routers acting as one logical pipe.
>
> 7606----
>    |         ------- (WAN) ----   Router
> 7606----
> Looking for redundancy of T1 circuits across two physical routers, Is MCMMP
> the answer, GLBP, or HSRP with multilink?
>
> Your suggestions are welcome.  Thank you in advance.
> --
> James
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>