[c-nsp] Cat7600/Sup720 and IPv4 vs IPv6 performance

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Fri May 8 05:29:42 EDT 2009


On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2009, Gert Doering wrote:
> >The 6500/Sup720-3BXL combo will do the job reasonably well :-) (and it's 
> >not actually "positioned as a switch for enterprises").
> ... and the RSP720 is the same listprice and has a much quicker CPU, so I 
> hope people do get that one instead of the SUP720 nowadays.

Wrong BU.  To avoid saying nasty things.

USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 304 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20090508/dc7d4a10/attachment.bin>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list