[c-nsp] Ethernet autonegotiation issue between Cat3560 and Cat2960
Juuso Lehtinen
juuso.lehtinen at gmail.com
Sun Nov 22 11:52:59 EST 2009
Thanks to all for answers,
Cables straight-thru, and identical cables are used for the working and
suspended trunks.
I will try replacing the cable with a new one tomorrow. If that does not
help, will try disabling autonegotiation.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick at inex.ie> wrote:
> On 22/11/2009 12:46, Juuso Lehtinen wrote:
>
>> Any ideas what might be causing this. I wonder if I'm running into some
>> kind
>> of minimum cable length problem. Switches are sitting adjacent to each
>> other
>> in a rack and connected with very short cables (0.5m ~ 2 ft).
>>
>
> Are you sure you're using the correct cable type? Either you should use a
> regular 568-B straight-thru cable, or else you should use a full GE
> crossover cable, which is wired like this:
>
> 1. white/orange -> white/green
> 2. orange/white -> green/white
> 3. white/green -> white/orange
> 4. blue/white -> brown/white
> 5. white/blue -> white/brown
> 6. green/white -> orange/white
> 7. white/brown -> white/blue
> 8. brown/white -> blue/white
>
> Note that for a 100M cross-over, you only cross orange with green, but for
> GE, you need to cross blue with brown too.
>
> Even if you're sure about the cabling, it's no harm to test it out with a
> decent cable tester. Maybe there's something strange going on with the UTP
> termination plugs?
>
> Cable length is only a problem where you use co-ax, as the co-axial cable
> medium can encourage all sorts of strange effects (signal reflection, timing
> problems, etc).
>
> Nick
>
>
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list